The best path to growth and profits

While market expenditures in brand preference competition rarely move the needle, the successful creation of new categories and subcategories do. There are plenty of case studies in every industry. In the automobile industry, the Chrysler minivan went 16 years with a viable competitor and to date as sold over 12 million vehicles. Enterprise Rent-A-Car arguably went 35 years with no competitors. Prius dominated the market for ten years and still has a 50% share. But there is also quantitative data to support the premise.

McKinsey, analyzing a database of over 1,000 firms from fifteen industries over forty years, found that new entrants into the database achieved a higher shareholder return than their industry average for the first ten years after entry. That return premium was 13 percent the first year, falling to 3 percent in the fifth. Thus, since new firms are more likely to bring new business models than existing businesses, the implication is that those creating new categories or subcategories will earn superior profits.

Another study of fifty venture capital firms found that six had abnormally high profitability. The common characteristic of these six were that they identified a prospective area of promise such an Internet-supporting technologies and seeded companies around the area. They were thus investing ahead of others that waited for the trend to become more visible and mature. As a result a proportion of their investments was successful at creating new categories or subcategories earlier than competitors and often enjoyed first mover advantages.

More direct evidence come from a study that considered strategic decisions within a firm. In their Blue Oceana book, Kim and Mauborgne looked at 150 strategic moves spanning a century. The 14 percent that were categorized as creating new categories had 38 percent of the revenues and 61 percent of the profits of the group.

New product research suggests that new offerings creating new subcategories receive abnormally high profits. Dozens of studies have shown that new product success is substantially driven by differentiation—it must be one of the most robust empirical relationships in business. Differentiation not only affects the value proposition but it also affects visibility, the ability of the new product to gain attention in the marketplace. New products tend to fail if they are not new and differentiated from the existing offerings. A highly differentiated offering is likely to create a new subcategory.

The remarkable fact is that creating new categories or subcategories is, with rare exceptions, the only way to make a difference with respect to sales and profits.

There is little doubt that the route to long-term strategic success involves increasing the efforts to win the brand relevance battle by creating new categories and subcategories even though that route does involve accepting risk and making organizational adjustments.

Posted March 15, 2011 / Permalink / Subscribe (e-mail) / Subscribe (RSS)
Tags: brand preference brand relevance enterprise

Share


Comments

First mover advantage has certainly been proven in tech marketing. But the real advantage is in differentiation. We are the most over-stored, over-inventoried, over-copycated (is that a word?) country in the world. It's nice to see someone advocating being new and not a me-too!

Don, the key especially in high tech is not only to be the first mover but not to move too early before the technology is ready and also to create barriers to competitors in order to neutralize copying.

I think product differentiation is the key word, with no high and real differentiation there will be so many subcategories that would just confuse the consumer, and the new offering will be just a big loss rather than a profit.

From my experience in the telecom industry, i have seen that many teleco operators launch new mobile plans, new lines, new bundles all with different branding and communicated end benefit, with the objective of increasing market share. When consumers come to make a choice, they face confusion because plans are very similar with no real differentiation relevant to the wants and needs of the end consumer.

Nimati, to really create a new category or subcategory you need differentiation based on a new "must have" for a segment. then you need to create barriers so that it is not easily copied. The new mobile plans because of substance or image did not create a "must have" nor did they create a brand that was authentic and a barrier.


(required)
(required, but will not be shown)
type the word INSPIRE below

remember your name, e-mail, and website

receive notifications of comments posted after yours


Sign up for e-mail updates

This blog post from Aaker on Brands was published on March 15, 2011. To see more posts, visit the blog home page.

Next: Enterprise should position the subcategory instead of fighting a brand battle

Previous: Brand Preference vs. Brand Relevance—Two Ways to Compete


Share